A full overview of my research projects can be found on my Curriculum Vitae. Projects can also be found on my ResearchGate profile, where project updates are also available. This page contains a brief overview of my current and recent projects.
Project Period: 2018 – 2021 | Funding Volume: €500,000 | Funder: Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research | Role: Co-Applicant; PhD Supervisor
Infrastructure administrators have been confronted with considerable investment needs in their infrastructure networks that mainly stem from an increased demand encountering an aged and deteriorated infrastructure stock. Since these investment needs can overlap in time and geographically, they can become cross-sectoral investment opportunities for increasing the responsiveness of the infrastructure system as a whole. However, for investment opportunities to be seized, infrastructure administrators have to be able to align their individual decision-making processes: the institutional system has to be responsive as well. The research project “Responsive Infrastructure through Responsive Institutions (RITRI)” addresses this challenge. It is guided by the following research question:
What are investment opportunities to make infrastructure systems responsive now and in the future, and what institutional rules need to be adapted so that these investment opportunities can be seized?
In order to answer the question, the research adopts an engaged scholarship approach bringing together in-depth scientific and practical knowledge on infrastructure planning and management and institutional analysis and design. It deploys multiple methods including scenario building, institutional analysis, stress-testing, and serious gaming to gain insights into the infrastructural opportunities and institutional requirements for increasing infrastructure responsiveness. By introducing responsiveness as the capability of a system to anticipate and shape future societal and technological changes, the research is particularly interested in how infrastructure administrators can play a more constitutive role in change trajectories. With its focus on cross-sectoral decision-making, the research also studies how infrastructure administrators can take up such a role in a joint manner.
The research will be conducted in close cooperation with the following infrastructure administrators: Alliander, the Port of Rotterdam, Rijkswaterstaat, ProRail, and Schiphol.
Project Period: 2016 – 2019 | Funding Volume: €600,000 | Funder: Rijkswaterstaat | Role: Postdoctoral Researcher
In this research project, we study how public-private partnerships in the development of infrastructure can be a driver for achieving added value or surplus value, i.e., how other goals and values can be achieved besides the regular mobility and transport goals and functions of infrastructure. At the same time, we are interested in how this prospect of added value can be a driver for the development of public-private partnerships. The project is funded by Rijkswaterstaat, the executive arm of the Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment.
Project Period: 2016 – 2018 | Funding Volume: €40,088 | Funder: Rijkswaterstaat | Role: Project Leader
The goal of the first research project is to conduct a review of what living labs are, what types of living labs can be distinguished, and to study how living labs can be an effective approach for Rijkswaterstaat – which is the executive arm of the Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment – in infrastructure and spatial planning. In the second project, the Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment (Rijkswaterstaat) asked us to reflect on the development of a Living Lab Circular Design. The goal of the project is to investigate the motivations, organization, goals, and expectations of the living lab.
Project Period: 2016 – 2017 | Funding Volume: €60,000 | Funder: Rijkswaterstaat | Role: Researcher
The Dutch governmental program ‘Room for the River’ aims to give the rivers in the Netherlands more room to be able to manage higher water levels. A second goal of the program is to increase the spatial quality of the river areas. In this project, we evaluate the extent to which this spatial quality objective has been achieved, and the conditions that have contributed (or not) to this. We apply Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in a first phase of the research project, followed by in-depth case studies of typical and deviant cases.